There really isn't much I can say about this great lens that has not been already said. But, I will warn you after you use this lens nothing else in your lens arsenal will have any appeal unless it is yet another "L" lens. After using the 70-200 f2.8 IS USM, I started selling off all my other lenses to save up for L replacements.

I bought this for my Canon EFS 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS USM. I am still using it on the same lens and is doing a very good job without distorting or altering the images. Great stuff

This is a fast 70-200mm lens, and f/2.8 max aperature is available throughout the zoom range. This gives me greater flexibility in low light or fast-action situations, and gives good depth-of-focus control. The fast lens speed and good image stabilization makes it more forgiving for hand-held shots. The IS will work on or off the tripod. Autofocus is fast and image quality is tops. It is well sealed for dust and moisture resistance (this does not mean waterproof).The price of having a faster lens is the greater weight and cost. If light weight is more important to you than speed, Canon's 70-200mm f/4 is lighter (and lower cost).

I paired this lens with a T6s crop body that I have been shooting with the last two years. My decision was based on intended use, value and cost. I considered Tamron, Sigma and Canon for this purchase.Specifically:Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II USMSigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSMObviously these lenses are in a different performance category than the 70-300mm f/4 I purchased. The primary consideration here was weight. I had just spent a week in Paris with 2 lenses. I did well with the canon 10-18 and sigma 17-70 f/2.8. What I needed was some additional reach beyond 112mm in a package I could travel with. The 70-300 (this lens) is the answer. The sigma worked well in the majority of my low light (no flash allowed) situations, but I didn't have the reach I needed in many cases. I've had some very favorable results with the APS-C format. I feel like I'll have that coverage now in a "travel friendly" package since it just isn't comfortable or practical to carry around a hefty 3.1lb f/2.8 lens when you are sightseeing.I took the time to read the lenses manual before it arrived. The build quality is good. Although mostly plastic, the lens has some heft, but is only half the weight of a f/2.8 with "L" glass. The LCD display is cool. I've been taking pictures with SLR and DSLR long enough so that DOF is more second nature. Will have to see how much I actually use it. So I put the lens on my camera and started shooting. The focusing system of the nano USM motor is truly fast. Great for video too.. It's quiet (near silent) My first shots were at 112, 216 and 480mm, subject at about 15' and wide open. IQ was good for a lens at this price point, no vignetting was noticeable at 112mm. The centers were super sharp. AF works perfectly when changing what part(s) of the frame are being metered. The edges of the photos were very clear. Not razor sharp, not overly soft. Once again more than acceptable for wide open non "L" or "Art" glass. I will be taking the lens out tomorrow to see what shots at f/8 look like. If they get sharper than what I saw at f/4, this lens will be great and I have no reason to think it won't be. Based on what I saw in the house, its a keeper.I do plan on switching to full frame. At that point, I'll step up to "L' glass but will keep this lens in my travel bag. This kit from Digital Goja was received in perfect condition and as promised. The included extras make this a great value.

I recently got into photography and purchased a camera "bundle" of the Rebel T6. The additional lenses in that bundle were apparently just a bad joke, but overall I was happy with the purchase. However, I still needed some new lenses for the shooting I want to do (concert photography/videography), so I started to research some more lenses. I was initally looking at getting the EF 50mm f/1.4, which is around $350, but decided to keep looking further, and eventually I came across both this lense, the EF 50mm f/1.8, and the EF-S 24mm f/2.8, which are both around $125. After reading several reviews I decided to go with the two cheaper lenses, and I am extremely happy I did so. While I may have been happier with the shooting of the f/1.4 to the f/1.8, I do not think it would have been an ideal lens for videography. That being said, I freaking love this lens. I've gotten to play a little bit in low light settings, though I have not been to any concerts with it yet. These are some shots from it, haven't played with them in Lightroom yet. I honestly love the way some of the photos look so much with just the lens, I probably won't even mess with editing them.Tl;dr - If you were torn on spending the extra $200 for the f/1.4; unless you're a professional, I would say save yourself the money and get this lens, it's amazing.

I haven’t used all the adapters yet but the ones I’ve needed have worked well. There’s a nice selection of adapters in this kit.

This little camera is great value for the price. 4k video is great in really brightly lit situations; however does get a little grainy when light diminishes. It comes with a ton of adapters, and two batteries to keep the fun going. If you're looking for a small, inexpensive, and lightweight camera, this is a great value.

Great lens, very sharp and produces great photos. I use it with my Canon EOS 6D Mark II. Low light performance is okay, only goes down to F/4. But other than that is a great daytime travel lens. I’ve taken it to Rome, Amalfi Coast, Puerto Vallarta, Dominican Republic, very durable lens.